DC Comics finally drew a line in the sand when transgender author Gretchen Felker-Martin celebrated the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, proving that even woke corporate America has limits when violence against patriots is openly glorified.
Story Highlights
- DC Comics canceled Felker-Martin’s Red Hood series one day after she posted celebratory comments about Charlie Kirk’s assassination
- The transgender horror author was suspended from Bluesky for promoting violence against the conservative activist
- Felker-Martin shows zero remorse, claiming DC applies double standards while other controversial creators keep their jobs
- The cancellation sparked industry debate over free speech limits and corporate responsibility in entertainment
Swift Corporate Response to Violence Celebration
DC Comics Editor-in-Chief Marie Javins delivered the cancellation news to Gretchen Felker-Martin by phone on September 10, 2025, just one day after the first issue of Red Hood hit shelves. The publisher cited the author’s “promotion of violence or harm” as unacceptable behavior that violated company standards. DC immediately canceled all future issues and provided retailers with credits for unsold copies, demonstrating unprecedented urgency in distancing themselves from the controversy.
Author Doubles Down Without Remorse
Felker-Martin publicly stated she harbors “no regrets” about her social media posts celebrating Kirk’s death, even after losing her major comic book deal. The transgender horror author, known for her novel “Manhunt,” accused DC of hypocrisy and declared she would never work with the publisher again. Her defiant stance reveals the radical mindset that views violence against conservative voices as justified, demonstrating exactly why corporate America should be cautious about platforming extremist ideologies.
Industry Double Standards Exposed
The controversy highlights troubling inconsistencies in how major publishers handle controversial creators. Felker-Martin pointed to other DC writers like Tom King and Jeph Loeb who faced controversies but retained their positions, suggesting marginalized creators face stricter scrutiny. However, this comparison ignores a crucial distinction: celebrating actual political assassination crosses moral boundaries that previous controversies did not. The incident exposes how identity politics previously shielded creators from accountability until their rhetoric became too extreme even for progressive corporations.
Progressive industry figures including Roxane Gay and David Brothers condemned DC’s decision as an attack on free speech and evidence of double standards. Their defense of Felker-Martin reveals how the entertainment industry’s left-wing establishment normalizes hatred toward conservative figures while demanding tolerance for their own radical viewpoints. This response demonstrates the warped moral compass that considers celebrating murder acceptable discourse when targeting political opponents.
Broader Implications for Conservative Values
This incident represents a rare corporate pushback against the normalization of violence against conservative voices in entertainment media. While DC’s decision appears motivated by risk management rather than principled opposition to leftist extremism, it nonetheless establishes boundaries around celebrating political assassination. The controversy exposes how deeply anti-conservative hatred has penetrated creative industries, where authors feel comfortable publicly glorifying murder of right-wing figures without expecting professional consequences.
The entertainment industry’s reaction to this cancellation will serve as a bellwether for future corporate responses to anti-conservative extremism. Patriots should remain vigilant about how major publishers handle creators who promote violence against traditional values and constitutional principles, ensuring that celebrating political assassination remains professionally unacceptable regardless of the target’s ideology.
